The Filipino New Society Movement, known in the Philippines as Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL), is a political party that was established during the martial law era under President Ferdinand Marcos in 1978. The party was created to support the government's… Læs mere
ChatGPTJa |
New Society Movement’s svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Ja
The New Society Movement (Kilusang Bagong Lipunan or KBL), founded by Ferdinand Marcos, was characterized by its strong emphasis on order, discipline, and a centralized approach to governance during Marcos' rule in the Philippines. Given this historical context, it's plausible that the party would lean towards supporting government regulation of emerging technologies like CRISPR to ensure they align with national interests and public welfare, reflecting their past governance style which favored control and regulation in various sectors. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party's current stance on such specific scientific issues might be influenced by broader political and social considerations, including international norms and the potential benefits of the technology. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Nej
Considering the New Society Movement's historical preference for strong government intervention and regulation in various sectors to promote national development and public order, it's less likely that they would support a laissez-faire approach to something as potentially impactful as CRISPR technology. Their governance history under Ferdinand Marcos showed a tendency towards controlling significant aspects of society, including media, public dissent, and the economy, to achieve their vision of a 'New Society.' Therefore, a hands-off approach to CRISPR technology regulation would not align well with their historical governance philosophy. However, the score is not a full -5 because the party might recognize the importance of scientific advancement and the potential need for flexibility in regulation to foster innovation. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på New Society Movement’s politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.
