Try the political quiz

1 Reply

 @8KYZBHDfrom Mindoro Occidental answered…3yrs3Y

I agree with the use of nuclear technology on abandoned places or where it can't harm anything, but as we progress we should move to a much more eco-friendly substitute.

 @9DKJ77YWorkers and Farmersanswered…7mos7MO

Yes, but we should also put an investment for research about nuclear waste disposal. Once nuclear waste is not a problem then yes, otherwise it's a NO

 @9DCB8YZLiberalanswered…7mos7MO

Yes, if its regulated properly and does not have harmful consequences to the environment

 @9DCB87FLiberalanswered…7mos7MO

I am skeptical because it might cost a lot when a calamity happens and the nuclear plants would be destroyed resulting to a problem like what happened to our neighbor country who use nuclear power.

 @93JDBB8PDP–Labananswered…2yrs2Y

Its 50 50 Beacause The Nuclear power plant Using a Fossil Fuel which is affect the Nature But Matutulungan tayu nitong Mag karoon ng sapat na kuryente

 @8F66Y7FLiberalfrom Mindoro Occidental answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, because this is the one of the power progresive plan by the president marcos to continue a differt aspects like power in the economy and to make a secret weapon in the philippines

 @95CH6B6Liberalfrom Mindoro Occidental answered…2yrs2Y

 @8XJC2HNKKKfrom Mindoro Occidental answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and this 2022 election the only candidate can make this is marcos.

 @8NZS88TNew Society Movementanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes because marcos make a power plant but cory aquino stop the power plant because the aquinos want to no longer remember the good things marcos did for the philippines

 @8NZQYGDNew Society Movementanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes because marcos make the nuclear power plant but cory aquino stop because the aquinos want to no longer remember the good things marcos did for the philippines

 @8L246Z9answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, as long as it is handled and maintained properly and by professionals, accidents back then are most likely not going to happen due to the advancements in nuclear technology, but we should not rush projects like this if the government actually wants to use nuclear energy, we should make use of the help other nations with experience with nuclear power.

 @93W7FD7 from Mississippi answered…2yrs2Y

  @JoshDaHooman from Washington answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as well as investing in other clean energy alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal.

 @924MYCK from GU answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens. However, renewable energy sources (i.e. wind, solar, geothermal, hydropower, etc.) should be prioritized first.

 @9375CJZ from California answered…2yrs2Y

I don't support the use of nuclear energy but I support the research of nuclear energy

 @9334YP3answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, in principal, just as soon as we figure out safer ways of disposing of the nuclear waste that it produces. Until then, we should increase investment into fossil fuels.

 @92YX7Z9 from California answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but the govt. should invest and require safe and clean ways of disposal with minimal environmental damage.

 @92XHX9V from New York answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZK5HYT from New York answered…2yrs2Y

 @928JWTG from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Only if the plants do everything in their power to stablize it and keep enemies away from them(could be used for nuke)

 @8ZSR5NL from GU answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures (i.e. proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely) to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens. However, renewable energy sources (i.e. wind, solar, geothermal, hydropower, etc.) should be prioritized first.

 @925JC5F from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

 @9229SCK from California answered…2yrs2Y

It is unhealthy for the environment and citizens and can cause long lasting negative affects.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures and with proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens, while we increase investment into cleaner, renewable energy sources.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures along with proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens, while we invest more into renewable energy sources.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures along with proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens, while we invest more into cleaner, renewable energy resources.

 @8ZGPKM9 from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

yes because it could come to extreme and we could get damaged and destroyed by other nuclear weaponized areas

 @8ZGPKQP from Washington answered…2yrs2Y

If someone like another state is using nukes for bad reasons and another state helps by using nukes to them? then yes.

  @RickStewart from Iowa answered…2yrs2Y

I support the free market deciding what kind of energy is created and at what cost. If there is pollution involved, the government should tax it, in order that no one be exposed to it without just compensation.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

Yes, but with more oversight and rigorous adherence to safety procedures to prevent accidents and to ensure safety of citizens, and with proper knowledge of how to dispose waste safely, while we invest more into renewable energy resources.

 @8YVYRGZ from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

i do but i also think that it could be bad for us just in case it ever were to not work

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes Yes, but with public subsidy Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives

Yes, but more oversight and rigorous following of safety procedures is needed to avoid accidents and to ensure safety of citizens so long as it can be guaranteed as safe and the waste is safely disposed.

 @8YKV6MS from Hawaii answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as it contained within a safe environment so that it doesn't harm people, or the environment.

 @6VWJ8PP from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

 @8XBRMPX from Missouri answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but it should be away from people so they wont be effected by the nuclear reactions.

 @8X92W7Q from Alabama answered…2yrs2Y

yes, I think it is OK but toward the future try to shift to a more environmentally sustainable option

 @8X8VVZ2 from Alabama answered…2yrs2Y

 @tasibuttel from Nevada answered…2yrs2Y

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...