Should the government be able to monitor phone calls and emails?

No. your personal data is treated almost literally in the same way as your own personal property

The government shall only be allowed to monitor when an emergency call or contact is occuring

Yes if the said individual is under investigation or is convicted.

No, Because That is their Privacy and cannot be allowed to seen by anyone

Yes, but only for those NPA

yes but only by court order in compliance to data privacy act

Yes, but only for high government officials

No, since this violates Article 12 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (Right to Privacy).

VERY MUCH. Taiwan and other counties have less crime rates connected with things like this because the government can monitor phone calls and emails.

No, because phone calls and emails are private.

No because everyone would be upset because they are now in an Orwellian society.

I believed that it should be but not that so much because it will be called as a personal matters.

no so people can have their own privacy

no, because this is part of the privacy of the netizens

depends if they find something sus they can monitor the phone calls and emials tho

i am conflicted

no, that is againts the data privacy act

No, privacy concern

no, because each person needs to have a privacy

no because we have the rights to have a privacy life. and we have the rights to have a freedom

No because its our own privacy

Yes, only if our cyber security is strengthed and secured.

Yes, only if the they have strengthened out cyber national security.

yes, to prevent terrorism, crimes, corruption, and scamming

Never. The government must NEVER be given the arbitrary power to access emails and phone calls. That is supremely unethical, highly unconstitutional, and utterly egregious violation of a person's privacy. Goverment can only monitor phone calls and emails of someone or a group of people after if they can obtain a warrant. But only after presenting legal, justifiable, and/or national security-related reasons to a judge.

No, Because it's our privacy they should not able to monitor it ,they should just investigate the bad people but they not monitor our privacy thing.

Yes but only for proven terrorists

Imagine your life as an open book; how would that change the way you communicate online?

Does the thought of being watched or listened to by someone you don't know make you uncomfortable, and why?

If your safety was at stake, would you be willing to give up some privacy, and where do you draw the line?

Would you accept more government surveillance if it significantly decreased acts of terror?

How does the possibility of having your digital footprint monitored affect your sense of freedom and trust in the government?

In a digital age filled with threats, should privacy still be considered an unalienable right?

Have you ever felt like your privacy was compromised, and if so, what should be the limits of that invasion?

How would you feel if your personal conversations were listened to without your consent for national security?

When, if ever, do you believe the benefits of surveillance outweigh the right to privacy?

No. This is a violation of privacy.

What would you do if you found out your personal messages were being monitored to prevent potential crimes?

No, and all Espionage (CSIS, CSE, et al...) should be banned.