Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

Yes, as long as it is not inhumane

Yes, but they should not disregard a life when an experiment does not work.

As long as it does not harm the animal.

yes but make sure the animals are safe

Yes, but they should not hurt the animals.

Animals is a living that God created.

Yes, but should also use those who are imprisoned for life for violent crimes, but should not be used for cosmetics.

Yes, but I a humane manner

Regulate such practice

Controlled & regulated

No, because some innocent animals may be damaged due to the toxicity of some elements in certain drugs and cosmetics.

Yes but for some specific animals only

yes as long as they are not endangered

Yes but with accordance to ethics.

Yes, but at the same time no. Not all animals should be tested if not neccessary.

If you had to choose between a tested and an untested medicine in a critical situation, knowing the tested one involved animal testing, which would you choose and why?

Imagine if animal testing had never been allowed; in what ways do you think modern medicine might be different?

Can you think of a situation where you would consider animal testing justifiable, and what would that situation be?

What is your standpoint on the moral implications of sacrificing animal lives for potentially life-saving drugs for humans?

How might society change if animal testing for medical research was no longer permitted?

Have you or someone you know ever benefited from a medical treatment developed through animal testing?

If there was an equally effective alternative to animal testing, would you support a complete switch and why?

What are your thoughts on the balance between human health benefits and the welfare of animals in medical research?

Have you ever used a medical treatment and later found out it was tested on animals; what was your reaction?

How do you feel about using animals for testing the products you use daily?

yes, but only if one, it has a low risk of greatly harming the animal, and two, the medical device/vaccine will save millions of lives, wipe out a virus, and/or is groundbreaking. ban cosmetic testing on animals altogether.

Yes, but only less important animals.

Not for cosmetics, and ensure that the animals are treated ethically.

Yes, unless the animals go through pain.

Yes as long as it’s not cruel and inhumane

Yes and allow human testing

Yes, but only after testing on themselves first.

Yes, but only things like rats and stuff

as long as they are not harmed

No, and it should have a consequence (jail)

Yes, but strictly rodents

Its a bad thing to not hurt animals

Yes, but only on mice or rodent animal species and not for cosmetics

Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or rodent animal species

Yes, but not for cosmetics and only on mice or various rodent types of animal species

yes only for rats though

Only if its a pointless animal.

No- prisoners should elect to be able to par take in this testing rather than animals if they are on death row- joining this program would halt death row.

Yes, but not if it’ll harm the animal

Yes, but only on non-intelligent animals

Yes for safety of drugs, caccines & medical devices. Not for cosmetics nor cosmetic surgeries.

As long as it’s not inhumane

Only animals like rats

some animals