@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@9GSLBCNIndependent6mos6MO
offer a program that rehabilitates them while also providing basic needs and work opportunities.
No. We need to create homes for them.
No, however, the government should invest on social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine. The government must find a way to relocate homeless individuals.
@97VMC5H1yr1Y
No, instead offer them a livelihood so that they can make an income for their living.
@968VFXT2yrs2Y
mixed cause ive seen californian shelters more of concentration camp less of actual home
No, homeless individuals are not allowed to sleep nor encamp on public property since they chose to refuse available shelter or housing that was offered to them.
@92M7Q8J2yrs2Y
We should convince them more to live in available shelter/housing provided by the government. In a good manner of course, not threatening them. This is for their own good and safety. Also, for a clean and organized society.
Yes, but not for too long, it'll be temporary until they find jobs and house to rent and income to survive. We can still make programs for them and donations
No, but shelters and housing should be built where there is economic activity instead of the outskirts.
No, but the government should create programs that help these homeless individuals access job opportunities near their houses.
@9DVGHMFIndependent8mos8MO
yes but add opportunities like jobs
No, make it a forceful act of giving them shelter and still provide adequate rights that wouldn't make them feel suffocated or restricted.
Give homeless individuals livelihood opportunity and seminars and compel them to accept the housing or shelter
@997BNLK1yr1Y
Give the proper housing
@996YX5S1yr1Y
No, must be give and provide proper housing to them
@996XKCK1yr1Y
no, i will give proper housing to them
@992WJPLIndependent1yr1Y
No, but construct public-operated or public-funded homeless shelters open to all.
@992K4PN1yr1Y
No but give them social programs to ensure their livelihood, food and give them an actual relocation area where jobs are easily available.
@98PS34L1yr1Y
Government needs to give homeless people a shelter.
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in designated encampment areas that do not interfere with the daily commerce of businesses. Utilize state and community social programs (and create more, if necessary) to provide free food, clothing and medicine, and continue to offer available shelter or housing
@8XVQSC52yrs2Y
They shouldn't get criminal records or anything, but it also depends on the area. There should be areas designated for homeless people to be able to encamp or sleep. Some shelters don't allow dogs/cats and their owners need them for emotional support because there is probably mental health issues going on too.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in designated encampment areas that do not interfere with the daily commerce of businesses. Utilize existing social programs to provide free food, clothing and medicine, and continue to offer available shelter or housing
@95S7WDY2yrs2Y
create programs that allow them to get help to better themselves
@94YDFJW2yrs2Y
Yes, and as individuals we should try to help within reason
@DengekiMatsuko2yrs2Y
We should create a program to give all homeless citizens somewhere to live
@9425J2G2yrs2Y
"Everything" is now public or government property. Homeless should be allowed to seek/find/make safe shelter where it does not affect others. As well as be held responsible for that areas well being.
@93ZQDBJ2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as the owner of the public property consents and the homeless person isn’t harming others.
@8VGD9NG2yrs2Y
It should be up to the owner of the property
@OneMohrTime2yrs2Y
No, but open outdoor spaces where it is allowed should be provided
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in designated encampment areas that do not interfere with the commerce of businesses. Utilize existing social programs to provide free food, clothing and medicine, and continue to offer available shelter or housing
@8VG8DZB2yrs2Y
Yes, but only outside of city limits.
@93VGL9L2yrs2Y
No, but ensure there are services and funding to shelter them in the way they need to be sheltered and feel safe (which may not be in a conventional homeless shelter). Also expand shelters that take in entire families. Many people turn down shelter because it requires breaking up their family (many don't allow husbands/fathers, etc.)
@32LNXXJ2yrs2Y
No, but create more social programs to provide free food, clothing and medicine as well as better and safer shelters as current are not at all "safe" spaces, which is why many refuse to stay.
@JoeStephens9992yrs2Y
Depends where the property is and what its use is for.
@4HNKVKT2yrs2Y
Yes, but designated areas. Increase social programs for food, clothing and medicine and do not allow panhandling. Give people the resources they need to get back on their feet but don't allow panhandling to be a way of life.
@93MSBYT2yrs2Y
Yes, but still protected outdoor shelters and not within a certain distance from schools
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...