Proponents of deficit reduction argue that governments who do not control budget deficits and debt are at risk of losing their ability to borrow money at affordable rates. Opponents of deficit reduction argue that government spending would increase demand for goods and services and help avert a dangerous fall into deflation, a downward spiral in wages and prices that can cripple an economy for years.
@926TS272yrs2Y
No, but funds must be diverted to methods that can provide revenue to the government
Reduce military spending, AND increase wealth tax
No, reallocate funding and increase taxes on the wealthy
@8Z7ZSQ5Democratic2yrs2Y
Improve fiscal management
@8Z7Q973Democratic2yrs2Y
Improve public spending & curb corruption
@8Z7Q67YDemocratic2yrs2Y
Improve government spending & curb corruption instead
@8VWL4XS3yrs3Y
Improve tax collection and use tax funds properly
yes, if it is not necessary
@8QTQCB83yrs3Y
Public spending should not be cut off assuming it does not go to corrupt officials while look for ways to pay off debt.
No, everybody must pay their own fair share of taxes
Stop corruption rather.
In our situation now my answer is no. Because we are in big need of medical attention.
@8KZX86T3yrs3Y
i don't really know the answer
Maybe the government should make cuts to trivial public spending to have enough money for us to pay the national debt.
No, think about other people like (poor families, etc.)
@8JF7J284yrs4Y
No, but increase taxes on the wealthy and government officials and reduce spending on the military & police.
@8HHGR634yrs4Y
Yes but amend the Constitution, remove 60-40 Economic Provisions and other Restricted Economic Provisions and Liberalize the Economy to Foreign Direct Investments
No, focus on ending tax evasion, reduce salary of government officials and increase taxes on the wealthy instead.
@9DTX79SIndependent8mos8MO
no, the national debt is not a serious issue
No, reduce military spending, provide a transparency spending report, and ban asking for confidential funds that makes the Philippines in great debts
No. Instead, end tax evasion, increase taxes for wealthy people and large multinational corporations, and reduce the number of government officials, and their benefits and salaries should be reduced.
No, reduce the government spending instead
@968V3BVDemocratic2yrs2Y
Cutting public spending can lead to poor materials for our government's project and a lot of public workers would also pay less than what they deserve so that's a hard no. I was thinking on what could be done and while reading the other choices I have come up a reason as to why cutting funds for those places wouldn't be beneficial, though I did spot a few reasons that are quite resonable. Here is my proposal. What if we continuously improved our country's economy and stand by our own feet? Though there is a chance that a debt would still be formed but it could be minimal… Read more
Yes, but if government officials are not corrupt, then no for the long run.
@92B7JYVDemocratic2yrs2Y
Look for other revenue source
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@93VVP972yrs2Y
reduce politicians benefits, reduce military spending, end tax evasion, and increase taxes on multinational corporations
@93MBYLY2yrs2Y
No, reduce military spending AND increases taxes on the wealthy.
@924MYCK2yrs2Y
Yes, if there is unnecessary or wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money used in public spending is spent wisely. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.
@mkimball2yrs2Y
Yes, but not from Medicare or Medicaid
@92ZYZRW2yrs2Y
No reduce military spending and tax evasion or tax loopholes for the wealthy
@9334YP32yrs2Y
Yes, the government should have little or no money to spend in the first place.
@92YHQCV2yrs2Y
No, instead we should A. reduce military spending, B. focus on ending tax evasion, and C. increase taxes on the wealthy
@88LK76J2yrs2Y
@8Z6PZKW2yrs2Y
Yes, and reduce non-military executive spending
@st606450782yrs2Y
No, defund the military, increase taxes on the wealthy, and increase taxes on multinational corporations.
@8YWHYGD2yrs2Y
No, defund the military, increase taxes on the wealthy, and increase taxes on large multinational corporations.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, if there is unnecessary or wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money/funds used in public spending is used more efficiently and appropriately. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.
@5BMX4XT2yrs2Y
Yes, Issue bonds, reduce federal oversite agencies that compete with state and local government, reduce corporate loopholes or institute a flat tax.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but only when there is some unnecessary/wasteful spending on certain areas, just ensure that the borrowed money/funds used in public spending are used more efficiently and appropriately. There should be a balanced budget that factor appropriate spending and national debt.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...