Should the government implement rent control policies to limit the amount landlords can charge for rent?

Rent control but not to limit and there should be policies that protects both the landlord and renter. An example is that rent should be based on quality of the building. Sometimes, landlords charge higher to the renter even though the property's worth is below that. The policy should serve as a mediator.

No, incentivize the development of new housing instead

Yes, housing is a basic right that should be affordable to anyone

No

Yes, but only in areas with housing shortages

No, ban corporate and foreign investors from purchasing residential real estate instead

No, rent controls have been shown to limit the supply of housing

Do you think it's fair for people to stay in the same apartment forever if the rent is kept low, while others can't find a place to live?

What do you think is more important: affordable rent for everyone or better quality housing, even if it's more expensive?

If rent control meant more people could stay in their homes, but fewer new apartments were built, would it still be worth it?

Have you or anyone you know ever struggled with the cost of rent? What could have made the situation better?

How might rent prices affect your decisions when choosing where to live after high school or college?

If rent control was implemented in your city, how do you think it would affect your neighborhood in the long run?

How would you decide what's a fair rent for an apartment: the market price, the tenant's income, or something else?

How would you feel if your rent didn't increase but there were fewer apartments available in your area?

Could rent controls, in your view, ever be unfair to landlords? Why or why not?

Can the government truly balance the needs of both tenants and landlords when deciding rent policies, or is one side always favored?