Should artists be held to the same reporting and disclosure requirements as hedge funds, mutual funds, and public companies when selling their artwork?

No

Not for indie artists, but should be required for artists in major studio labels

Can the introduction of financial regulations into the art world be a form of protection for buyers, or does it pose a threat to artistic freedom?

Would the requirement for artists to disclose financial information change your perception of the art world's exclusivity and mystique?

Imagine creating a piece of art and being told it's now considered a security; what would be your initial reaction?

How important do you believe transparency is in art transactions compared to maintaining an artist's right to privacy?

If buying art became as regulated as buying stocks, would that change your interest or ability to participate in the art market?

In what ways do you think requiring artists to follow these financial regulations could influence the types of art being produced?

Do you agree with the perspective that implementing such regulations could protect the art community from fraud, or do you see it as an unnecessary complication?

How do you feel about the balance between ensuring ethical practices in the art market and preserving the unique culture of art creation and collection?

How would you feel if your favorite artist's work became significantly harder to buy due to new financial regulations?

Do you think treating artwork like stocks or bonds could impact how people appreciate art?