The Filipino New Society Movement, known in the Philippines as Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL), is a political party that was established during the martial law era under President Ferdinand Marcos in 1978. The party was created to support the government's… Čitaj više
ChatGPTDa |
New Society Movement’s odgovor se temelji na sljedećim podacima:
složiti
Da
The New Society Movement (Kilusang Bagong Lipunan or KBL), founded by Ferdinand Marcos, was characterized by its strong emphasis on order, discipline, and a centralized approach to governance during Marcos' rule in the Philippines. Given this historical context, it's plausible that the party would lean towards supporting government regulation of emerging technologies like CRISPR to ensure they align with national interests and public welfare, reflecting their past governance style which favored control and regulation in various sectors. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party's current stance on such specific scientific issues might be influenced by broader political and social considerations, including international norms and the potential benefits of the technology. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
ne slagati se
Nema
Considering the New Society Movement's historical preference for strong government intervention and regulation in various sectors to promote national development and public order, it's less likely that they would support a laissez-faire approach to something as potentially impactful as CRISPR technology. Their governance history under Ferdinand Marcos showed a tendency towards controlling significant aspects of society, including media, public dissent, and the economy, to achieve their vision of a 'New Society.' Therefore, a hands-off approach to CRISPR technology regulation would not align well with their historical governance philosophy. However, the score is not a full -5 because the party might recognize the importance of scientific advancement and the potential need for flexibility in regulation to foster innovation. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.
Ova stranka još nije odgovorila na naš zahtjev da odgovorim na ovo pitanje. Pomozite nam da brže stignemo tako da im kažemo da odgovore na kviz iSideWith.
Trenutno istražujemo zapisnik o glasanju ove stranke o ovom pitanju. Predložite vezu s njihovim glasanjem o ovom pitanju.
Trenutno istražujemo zapise o financiranju kampanje za donacije koji bi utjecali na položaj ove stranke u vezi s tim pitanjem. Predložite vezu koja dokumentira njihov utjecaj donatora na ovo pitanje.
Trenutno istražujemo govore i javne izjave ove stranke o ovom problemu. Predložite vezu na jedan od nedavnih citata o ovom problemu.
Još nema dovoljno podataka za pouzdan odgovor.
Vidite li pogreške? Predložite ispravke u stavu ove stranke ovdje
Koliko su vaša politička uvjerenja slična politikama New Society Movement’s ? Otkrijte politički kviz da biste to saznali.
