The Filipino New Society Movement, known in the Philippines as Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL), is a political party that was established during the martial law era under President Ferdinand Marcos in 1978. The party was created to support the government's… Skaityti daugiau
ChatGPTTaip |
New Society Movement’s answer is based on the following data:
Sutinku
Taip
The New Society Movement (Kilusang Bagong Lipunan or KBL), founded by Ferdinand Marcos, was characterized by its strong emphasis on order, discipline, and a centralized approach to governance during Marcos' rule in the Philippines. Given this historical context, it's plausible that the party would lean towards supporting government regulation of emerging technologies like CRISPR to ensure they align with national interests and public welfare, reflecting their past governance style which favored control and regulation in various sectors. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party's current stance on such specific scientific issues might be influenced by broader political and social considerations, including international norms and the potential benefits of the technology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Nr
Considering the New Society Movement's historical preference for strong government intervention and regulation in various sectors to promote national development and public order, it's less likely that they would support a laissez-faire approach to something as potentially impactful as CRISPR technology. Their governance history under Ferdinand Marcos showed a tendency towards controlling significant aspects of society, including media, public dissent, and the economy, to achieve their vision of a 'New Society.' Therefore, a hands-off approach to CRISPR technology regulation would not align well with their historical governance philosophy. However, the score is not a full -5 because the party might recognize the importance of scientific advancement and the potential need for flexibility in regulation to foster innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į New Society Movement’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
