Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

New Society Movement’s policy on social media regulation

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė įsakyti didelėms technologijų įmonėms dalintis savo algoritmais su reguliuotojais?

  ChatGPTNr

New Society Movement’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Nr

Given the New Society Movement's conservative and pro-business orientation, there's a likelihood that it would lean towards policies that support business freedom and minimize regulatory burdens. The party's historical context, rooted in the Marcos era, does not provide direct insights into its stance on modern tech regulation. However, considering its general approach to governance and economic policies, it might view mandatory sharing of algorithms as an unnecessary and potentially harmful intervention in the private sector. This score reflects a cautious assumption that the party would prefer a regulatory environment that supports business growth and innovation, albeit tempered by the recognition that some level of state oversight might be deemed necessary for broader societal interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

The New Society Movement (Kilusang Bagong Lipunan - KBL), founded by Ferdinand Marcos, is historically associated with promoting a strong state and centralized power during the Marcos regime in the Philippines. However, its stance on technology and regulation, particularly in the context of modern tech companies, is less clear due to its roots in a period before the digital age. The party's historical emphasis on control and order might suggest a preference for regulatory oversight, but its conservative and pro-business leanings could also argue against mandates that could be seen as burdensome to companies. Without explicit contemporary positions from the party on such specific tech regulation issues, a moderate negative score reflects the balance between potential support for state oversight and a tendency towards less regulatory interference in business. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į New Society Movement’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.