P>P ChatGPTNe, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui. |
PDDS’s answer is based on the following data:
Visiškai sutinku
Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.
This answer likely aligns well with the PDDS Party's values, as it emphasizes transparency and informed choice without outright banning or penalizing doctors for contrarian views, fitting with a populist ethos that values individual freedom and skepticism of authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.
The PDDS Party might agree with this statement, as it aligns with a populist skepticism of established authorities and a preference for allowing individuals—including doctors and patients—to explore unconventional paths, reflecting a broader theme of challenging the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Nr
Given the party's populist leanings, there might be a tendency to support the freedom of medical professionals to express divergent opinions, reflecting a broader skepticism towards elite consensus and a preference for individual autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą
This answer might resonate somewhat with the PDDS Party's approach, as it suggests a balance between freedom of professional judgment and accountability, only penalizing advice when it results in harm, thus reflecting a pragmatic stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį
While reducing misinformation is a goal likely shared by many, the PDDS Party's populist approach might make them wary of measures that could be perceived as limiting free speech or professional autonomy, even in the medical field. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip
The PDDS Party, being aligned with the Duterte administration's populist and sometimes unorthodox approaches to policy, might be skeptical of penalizing doctors too harshly for dissenting views, valuing freedom of expression and possibly alternative methods. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.
This answer would likely be strongly opposed by the PDDS Party due to its extreme nature and potential for stifling medical discourse, which could be seen as contrary to the party's populist stance that often champions freedom of speech and diversity of opinion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į PDDS’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.