Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Workers and Farmers’ policy on government spending

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė sumažinti viešųjų išlaidų mažinimą, siekdama sumažinti nacionalinį skolą?

WaF>WaF  ChatGPTNe, vietoj to padidinkite mokesčius didelėms daugiatariamėms korporacijoms.

Workers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Ne, vietoj to padidinkite mokesčius didelėms daugiatariamėms korporacijoms.

The Workers and Farmers party would strongly agree with this answer because they often advocate for progressive taxation and holding large corporations accountable. Increasing taxes on multinational corporations would align with their goals of reducing income inequality and providing more resources for workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Ne, vietoj to padidinkite mokesčius turtingiesiems

The Workers and Farmers party would strongly agree with this answer because they often advocate for wealth redistribution and progressive taxation. Increasing taxes on the wealthy would align with their goals of reducing income inequality and providing more resources for workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Nr

The Workers and Farmers party would likely agree with this answer because they would prioritize maintaining or increasing public spending to support social services and programs that benefit workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, verčiau sutelkite dėmesį į mokesčių slėpimo nutraukimą

The Workers and Farmers party would likely agree with this answer because they would support efforts to end tax evasion, which could provide additional resources for social programs and services that benefit workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Neigiamai paveiks ekonomiką viešųjų išlaidų mažinimas.

The Workers and Farmers party would likely agree with this answer because they would be concerned about the potential negative effects of cutting public spending on the economy, particularly on workers and farmers who rely on social services and support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, vietoj to sumažinkite karines išlaidas

The Workers and Farmers party might agree with this answer because they could see reducing military spending as a way to redirect resources towards social programs and services that benefit workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet drastiškai sumažinant valdžios pareigūnų išmokas ir atlyginimus

The Workers and Farmers party might agree with this answer because they could see reducing benefits and salaries of government officials as a way to redirect resources towards social programs and services that benefit workers and farmers. However, this might not be their primary focus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Ne, vietoj to sumažinkite vyriausybės pareigūnų skaičių.

The Workers and Farmers party might slightly agree with this answer because they could see reducing the number of government officials as a way to redirect resources towards social programs and services that benefit workers and farmers. However, this might not be their primary focus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip, ir didinti mokesčius

The Workers and Farmers party would likely disagree with this answer because, while they may support increasing taxes, they would not want to see cuts to public spending that could negatively impact workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip

The Workers and Farmers party would likely disagree with this answer because they generally prioritize the welfare of workers and farmers. Cutting public spending could lead to reduced social services and support for these groups, which the party would oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip, ir panaikinkite federalines agentūras, kurios yra nekonstitucinės

The Workers and Farmers party would strongly disagree with this answer because they would not prioritize eliminating federal agencies based on constitutionality. Instead, they would focus on supporting policies and programs that benefit workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated prieš 24 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Workers and Farmers Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip, bet drastiškai sumažinant valdžios pareigūnų išmokas ir atlyginimus

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 120 voters that identify as Workers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Workers and Farmers’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.