The Filipino Federal political party, known as Partido Federal ng Pilipinas (PFP), is a political organization in the Philippines that advocates for the shift from a unitary form of government to a federal system. This party believes that transitioning to… Read more
FP>FP ChatGPTYes, but only by court order |
Federal Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only by court order
The Federal Party would strongly agree with this statement, as they would likely support a balance between government monitoring and individual privacy rights. Requiring a court order for government monitoring of phone calls and emails would provide a legal framework and oversight to ensure that monitoring is done only when necessary and justified. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong support for this particular reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
The Federal Party would likely agree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring to combat terrorism and ensure national security. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong support for this particular reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The Federal Party may agree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring of those with criminal backgrounds to ensure public safety and prevent criminal activities. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong support for this particular reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Federal Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring in certain situations. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong support for unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Federal Party may somewhat disagree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring in certain situations. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong opposition to any form of government monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The Federal Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring in certain situations, such as combating terrorism and ensuring national security. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong opposition to enacting legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
Federal Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 55 voters that identify as Federal Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Federal Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
