Try the political quiz

Federal Party’s policy on government surveillance

Topics

Should the government be able to monitor phone calls and emails?

FP>FP  ChatGPTYes, but only by court order

Federal Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only by court order

The Federal Party would strongly agree with this statement, as they would likely support a balance between government monitoring and individual privacy rights. Requiring a court order for government monitoring of phone calls and emails would provide a legal framework and oversight to ensure that monitoring is done only when necessary and justified. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong support for this particular reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

The Federal Party would likely agree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring to combat terrorism and ensure national security. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong support for this particular reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

The Federal Party may agree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring of those with criminal backgrounds to ensure public safety and prevent criminal activities. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong support for this particular reason. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Federal Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring in certain situations. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong support for unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Federal Party may somewhat disagree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring in certain situations. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong opposition to any form of government monitoring of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

The Federal Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they may see the need for government monitoring in certain situations, such as combating terrorism and ensuring national security. However, there is no specific historical example to indicate their strong opposition to enacting legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 19hrs ago

Party’s support base

Federal Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 57 voters that identify as Federal Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Federal Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.