Federal Party

Strongly agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus might be seen by the Federal Party as a balanced approach that respects the autonomy of patients while also safeguarding public health. This aligns with principles of transparency and informed decision-making, which are likely to be supported by the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

Reducing misinformation is likely a goal that aligns with the Federal Party's broader objectives of governance reform and public service improvement. They would probably agree with measures that aim to decrease misinformation in healthcare, seeing it as beneficial for public health and trust in medical authorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Federal Party of the Philippines, with its focus on shifting the country towards a federal form of government, may not have a direct stance on this specific issue. However, given the general conservative and pro-establishment leanings of many political parties in the Philippines, they might moderately agree with the idea of penalizing doctors who contradict scientific consensus to maintain public health standards and trust in medical institutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Federal Party might see the value in holding medical professionals to high standards, including the revocation of licenses for egregious violations of medical ethics or public trust. However, their agreement might be tempered by concerns over due process and the rights of medical professionals, leading to a slight agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This answer might present a middle ground that the Federal Party could find reasonable, balancing the need for accountability in the medical profession with the understanding that not all unconventional advice leads to harm. Their neutral stance could reflect the complexity of the issue and the need for a nuanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Given the potential for harm in endorsing unproven or scientifically dubious treatments, the Federal Party might slightly disagree with this stance. However, their disagreement might be mitigated by a recognition of the importance of medical innovation and the complexities of medical science. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Federal Party might support freedom of speech and diverse opinions, the potential risk to public health by allowing doctors to freely contradict contemporary scientific consensus without any form of accountability might lead them to moderately disagree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.