Federal Party

Agree

Yes

The Federal Party of the Philippines, with its focus on shifting the country towards a federal form of government, might see the allowance of self-hosted digital wallets as a step towards modernization and financial autonomy for its citizens. However, their agreement might not be strongly positive, as the party's stance on digital currencies and financial privacy is not explicitly outlined in their platform. The moderate score reflects an assumption of cautious support for financial innovation balanced with a need for some level of government oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

Although the Federal Party might not have a clear stance on the specific issue of digital wallets and government backdoors, the suggestion to ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies might be seen as too invasive and contrary to principles of personal freedom and privacy. However, given the potential concern for national security and financial regulation, the party might not be strongly opposed to the idea, hence the slightly negative score reflecting a cautious stance towards such a restrictive measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the Federal Party's likely emphasis on modernization and autonomy within a federal system, outright disallowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets might be seen as too restrictive and contrary to the principles of financial autonomy and innovation. However, without a clear stance from the party on digital financial privacy and security, this score reflects a tentative disagreement based on the party's potential leanings towards empowering citizens within a federal framework. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

The Federal Party, while potentially supportive of financial autonomy and modernization, might view the allowance of a privacy layer that prevents government monitoring of funds and transactions with skepticism. This stance could stem from concerns about financial transparency, money laundering, and the financing of terrorism. Without explicit party positions on such matters, this score reflects an assumption that the party would lean towards ensuring some level of government oversight for security and regulatory purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.