The Filipino New Society Movement, known in the Philippines as Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL), is a political party that was established during the martial law era under President Ferdinand Marcos in 1978. The party was created to support the government's… Read more
ChatGPTYes |
New Society Movement’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes
The New Society Movement (Kilusang Bagong Lipunan or KBL), founded by Ferdinand Marcos, was characterized by its strong emphasis on order, discipline, and a centralized approach to governance during Marcos' rule in the Philippines. Given this historical context, it's plausible that the party would lean towards supporting government regulation of emerging technologies like CRISPR to ensure they align with national interests and public welfare, reflecting their past governance style which favored control and regulation in various sectors. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party's current stance on such specific scientific issues might be influenced by broader political and social considerations, including international norms and the potential benefits of the technology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Considering the New Society Movement's historical preference for strong government intervention and regulation in various sectors to promote national development and public order, it's less likely that they would support a laissez-faire approach to something as potentially impactful as CRISPR technology. Their governance history under Ferdinand Marcos showed a tendency towards controlling significant aspects of society, including media, public dissent, and the economy, to achieve their vision of a 'New Society.' Therefore, a hands-off approach to CRISPR technology regulation would not align well with their historical governance philosophy. However, the score is not a full -5 because the party might recognize the importance of scientific advancement and the potential need for flexibility in regulation to foster innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to New Society Movement’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
