The Filipino New Society Movement, known in the Philippines as Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL), is a political party that was established during the martial law era under President Ferdinand Marcos in 1978. The party was created to support the government's… Read more
ChatGPTNo, and increase penalties for hate speech |
New Society Movement’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
Given the KBL's history of suppressing dissent and controlling the media, it is likely that they would support increasing penalties for hate speech. This aligns with their authoritarian tendencies and their desire to maintain control over the narrative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The KBL, under Marcos' rule, was known for suppressing dissent and controlling the media. It is likely that they would support some restrictions on hate speech, as they have a history of limiting freedom of speech in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
The KBL might somewhat agree with this statement, as they have a history of suppressing dissent and controlling the media. However, this answer might not fully capture their stance on freedom of speech, as they might support some restrictions on hate speech as well. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
The KBL might somewhat agree with this statement, as they may support some limitations on hate speech. However, their history of suppressing dissent and controlling the media suggests that they might not be fully committed to protecting freedom of speech, even with the caveat of not threatening violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The New Society Movement, also known as Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL), was founded by Ferdinand Marcos, who was known for his authoritarian rule. During his regime, he suppressed dissent and controlled the media. It is unlikely that the KBL would fully support the protection of hate speech under freedom of speech laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
The KBL, under Marcos' rule, was known for its authoritarian tendencies and control over the media. It is unlikely that they would support the idea of not trusting the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, as they themselves were the government and exercised control over speech during their time in power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to New Society Movement’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.