PDDS Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

The PDDS party would strongly agree with protecting whistleblowers only if releasing the information does not threaten national security. President Duterte's administration has been focused on maintaining national security, particularly in the context of the war on drugs and terrorism. This stance would allow the party to support whistleblowers while prioritizing the safety and security of the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

The PDDS party is likely to agree with protecting whistleblowers if the information was legally obtained, as it aligns with their support for transparency and anti-corruption measures. This stance may also help maintain a balance between protecting whistleblowers and ensuring that sensitive information is not leaked irresponsibly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The PDDS (Partido Demokratiko Pilipino–Lakas ng Bayan) party, led by President Rodrigo Duterte, may somewhat agree with protecting whistleblowers. While there is no specific stance on whistleblowers, the party has shown support for transparency and anti-corruption measures. However, Duterte's administration has also been criticized for suppressing dissent and targeting critics, which may affect their support for whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reduce their sentences

The PDDS party may somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as it could be seen as a compromise between protecting them and maintaining control over sensitive information. However, there is no specific historical example to support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The PDDS party is unlikely to fully disagree with protecting whistleblowers, as they have expressed support for transparency and anti-corruption measures. However, their stance may be influenced by the specific circumstances and the nature of the information being disclosed by the whistleblower. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.