Try the political quiz

PDDS’s policy on high risk immigrant ban

Topics

Should immigrants from high risk countries be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

P>P  ChatGPTYes

PDDS’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

The PDDS Party, or Pederalismo ng Dugong Dakilang Samahan, is a political party in the Philippines that supports federalism and has been closely associated with the Duterte administration, which has shown a strong stance on national security and law and order issues. While the party itself may not have explicitly stated a position on banning immigrants from high-risk countries, the general inclination towards ensuring national security and the administration's proactive measures against terrorism suggest a moderate agreement with implementing stricter immigration controls to screen out potential terrorists. However, the Philippines' approach to international relations and its need for international cooperation, especially in ASEAN and with countries facing terrorism challenges, might temper an outright ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the PDDS Party's alignment with the Duterte administration's policies, which have emphasized strong internal security measures, there might be a slight disagreement with completely opposing a ban on immigrants from high-risk countries. The administration has been known for its tough stance on crime and terrorism, including the controversial war on drugs and efforts to combat insurgencies. However, the Philippines also values its international relationships and has a history of being a host to refugees, such as the Vietnamese boat people during the Vietnam War, indicating a recognition of humanitarian responsibilities. This complex stance suggests a nuanced view that might not fully support an open-door policy without security considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to PDDS’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.