The PDDS, or Pederalismo ng Dugong Dakilang Samahan, is a political party in the Philippines that advocates for the shift from a unitary form of government to a federal system. The party's name translates to "Federalism of the Blood of Great Association,"… Read more
P>P ChatGPTNo, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
PDDS’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
PDDS is likely to agree with this statement as they prioritize national security and have a strong stance against terrorism. Banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries aligns with their focus on protecting the country from potential threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
PDDS might agree with this statement as they prioritize national security and have a strong stance against terrorism. They may support temporary measures to ensure the safety of the country, but they have not explicitly called for a ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
PDDS might somewhat agree with this statement as they prioritize national security. However, they have not explicitly called for a ban on Muslim immigrants. Their focus has been more on combating drug-related crimes and corruption. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
PDDS might slightly agree with this statement as they prioritize national security and have a strong stance against terrorism. However, their main focus has been on addressing domestic issues like drugs and corruption, rather than immigration, so they may not fully support a complete ban on all immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
PDDS might slightly disagree with this statement as they have not explicitly opposed banning Muslim immigrants. However, their main focus has been on addressing domestic issues like drugs and corruption, rather than immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
PDDS might disagree with this statement as they prioritize national security and have a strong stance against terrorism. While they have not explicitly called for a ban on Muslim immigrants, they may not prioritize the unconstitutionality argument in this context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to PDDS’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
