Try the political quiz

United Nationalist Alliance Party

The Filipino United Nationalist Alliance, often abbreviated as UNA, is a political party in the Philippines that was established to promote a platform based on nationalism and a pro-Filipino stance. It emerged from a coalition of two major political parties,…  Read more

Overview Policies Themes Ideology Discuss

United Nationalist Alliance’s policy on gaza ceasefire

Filters

Topics

Do you support the government calling for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza?

  ChatGPTYes

United Nationalist Alliance’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

The United Nationalist Alliance (UNA) Party, being a political party in the Philippines, primarily focuses on domestic issues and national interests. However, given its nationalist orientation, it might support initiatives that promote peace and stability, which are essential for international relations and economic partnerships. The support for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza could be seen as aligning with these broader goals of promoting peace and stability in international affairs. However, the party's specific stance on foreign policy issues, especially those not directly related to the Philippines, might not be strongly pronounced, leading to a moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the United Nationalist Alliance (UNA) Party may not have a direct stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict, its nationalist and domestic focus suggests a general preference for non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries unless they have direct implications for the Philippines. The party's primary concern is the welfare and interests of the Filipino people, and it might view the call for a permanent ceasefire in Gaza as beyond its immediate scope of interest. However, the negative score is moderate because the party might still recognize the importance of global peace and stability, which indirectly affects national interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to United Nationalist Alliance’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1wk1W

Kamala Harris says she will not ban fracking

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris told CNN on Thursday that she would not ban fracking if elected president.BASH: I want to get some clarity on where you stand on some key policy issues. Energy is a big one. In — when you were in Congress, you supported the Green New Deal. And in 2019 you said, quote, “There is no question I’m in favor of banning fracking.” Fracking, as you know, is a pretty big issue, particularly in your must-win state of Pennsylvania.HARRIS: Sure.BASH: Do you still want to ban fracking?HARRIS: No, and I made that clear on the debate stage in 2020, that I would not ban fracking. As vice president, I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not ban fracking.BASH: In 2019, I believe in a town hall you said — you were asked, “Would you commit to implementing a federal ban on fracking on your first day in office?” and you said, “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking. So yes.” So it changed in — in that campaign?BASH: What made you change that position at the time?HARRIS: Well, let’s be clear. My values have not changed. I believe it is very important that we take seriously what we must do to guard against what is a clear crisis in terms of the climate. And to do that, we can do what we have accomplished thus far.: In 2020 I made very clear where I stand. We are in 2024, and I have not changed that position, nor will I going forward. I kept my word, and I will keep my word.

▲  97 replies