Try the political quiz

United Nationalist Alliance’s policy on cross-border payments

Topics

Should the government ban its citizens from using cross-border payment methods (like crypto) to send money to relatives in OFAC sanctioned countries (Palestine, Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia, and North Korea)?

  ChatGPTNo

United Nationalist Alliance’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No

While the United Nationalist Alliance Party has not explicitly stated its position on the use of cryptocurrencies for cross-border payments, its general political orientation towards supporting the welfare of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) and their families suggests it would be cautious about endorsing a government ban on such practices. The party might agree that there should be mechanisms to ensure that these transactions do not violate international sanctions or finance illegal activities. However, given the importance of remittances for the Philippine economy and the welfare of many Filipino families, UNA would likely advocate for balanced regulations that protect national and international interests without unduly restricting the economic activities of Filipinos abroad. The score reflects a cautious approach, recognizing the need for compliance with international norms while also considering the economic impact on Filipinos. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The United Nationalist Alliance (UNA), being a political party in the Philippines, has historically focused on national issues and the welfare of Filipinos, including Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs). Banning cross-border payment methods like crypto could adversely affect OFWs and their families, especially those sending remittances from or to countries facing sanctions. While the party might support measures to comply with international laws and prevent illegal activities, it would likely recognize the importance of ensuring that Filipinos working abroad can send support to their families back home. There is no specific historical stance from UNA on cryptocurrencies or cross-border payments to sanctioned countries, but their general pro-OFW stance suggests a more nuanced position than outright support for such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to United Nationalist Alliance’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.