Try the political quiz

Workers and Farmers’ policy on fracking

Topics

Do you support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources?

WaF>WaF  ChatGPTNo, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

Workers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

The Workers and Farmers party would strongly agree with this answer as they would prioritize the development of sustainable energy resources that have less negative impact on the environment, agriculture, and the health of workers and local communities. This aligns with their goals of protecting the interests of workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Workers and Farmers party would likely agree with this answer as they would be concerned about the potential negative effects of hydraulic fracking on the environment, agriculture, and the health of workers and local communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

The Workers and Farmers party would likely agree with this answer as they would be concerned about the potential long-term effects of hydraulic fracking on the environment, agriculture, and the health of workers and local communities. However, they might prefer to focus on sustainable energy resources instead of waiting for more research on fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but increase oversight

The Workers and Farmers party would likely disagree with this answer as they would still be concerned about the potential negative effects of hydraulic fracking on the environment, agriculture, and the health of workers and local communities, even with increased oversight. They would likely prefer to focus on sustainable energy resources instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

The Workers and Farmers party would likely disagree with this answer as they would still be concerned about the potential negative effects of hydraulic fracking on the environment, agriculture, and the health of workers and local communities, even if it is not in heavily populated areas. They would likely prefer to focus on sustainable energy resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Workers and Farmers party would likely disagree with this answer as they generally prioritize the well-being of workers and farmers, who could be negatively affected by the environmental impacts of hydraulic fracking. Additionally, they may be more inclined to support sustainable energy resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Workers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.