62% Yes |
38% No |
54% Yes |
31% No |
4% Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development |
7% No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
3% Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment |
|
2% Yes, and it should be at least two years of service |
|
1% Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record |
See how support for each position on “Mandatory Military Service” has changed over time for 5.8k Philippines voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Mandatory Military Service” has changed over time for 5.8k Philippines voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Philippines users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9HQKXDP4mos4MO
Neither, service should be a choice not an obligation but if inherently needed in times of war, preparations must be of education and skill development alongside harbouring training in combat knowledge.
@9DMPD5H8mos8MO
Yes, but it shouldn't only be limited to prioritizing military combat skills, but also in the field of giving aid (medic), and enhancing skills needed to survive if an unwanted war came through. They also should consider the abilities of each person considering that every person is different in terms of health and capabilities.
@9CXDCSX10mos10MO
No, our armed forces is too woefully understaffed, inadequate, corrupt, and under equipped.
@9B8JM8T1yr1Y
Yes, except for those with pre-existing health conditions like asthma
@982VVVK1yr1Y
No, Service should be a choice and Guns are still illegal here so why bother lmao
@968VFXT2yrs2Y
No, better off acknowledging the 2nd amendment
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mandatory Military Service” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to Philippines voters.