Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power station. Since plans for a nuclear power plant at Carnsore Point in County Wexford were dropped in the 1970s, nuclear power in Ireland has been off the agenda. Ireland gets about 60% of its energy from gas, 15% from renewable and the remainder from coal and peat. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants. Opponents argue that recent nuclear disasters in Japan prove that nuclear power is far from safe.
64% Yes |
36% No |
55% Yes |
29% No |
5% Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
8% No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
2% Yes, and nationalize the industry |
|
1% Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy |
|
1% Yes, but with public subsidy |
See how support for each position on “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 8.6k Philippines voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Nuclear Energy” has changed over time for 8.6k Philippines voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Philippines users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8KYZBHD3yrs3Y
I agree with the use of nuclear technology on abandoned places or where it can't harm anything, but as we progress we should move to a much more eco-friendly substitute.
@9DKJ77Y8mos8MO
Yes, but we should also put an investment for research about nuclear waste disposal. Once nuclear waste is not a problem then yes, otherwise it's a NO
@9DCB8YZ8mos8MO
Yes, if its regulated properly and does not have harmful consequences to the environment
@9DCB87F8mos8MO
I am skeptical because it might cost a lot when a calamity happens and the nuclear plants would be destroyed resulting to a problem like what happened to our neighbor country who use nuclear power.
@93JDBB82yrs2Y
Its 50 50 Beacause The Nuclear power plant Using a Fossil Fuel which is affect the Nature But Matutulungan tayu nitong Mag karoon ng sapat na kuryente
@8F66Y7F4yrs4Y
Yes, because this is the one of the power progresive plan by the president marcos to continue a differt aspects like power in the economy and to make a secret weapon in the philippines
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Nuclear Energy” news articles, updated frequently.
@ISIDEWITH2hrs2H
Representatives from more than 30 countries gathered in Brussels in March at a nuclear summit hosted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Belgian government. Thirty-four nations, including the United States and China, agreed “to work to fully unlock the potential of nuclear energy,” including extending the lifetime of existing reactors, building new nuclear power plants and deploying advanced reactors.“Nuclear technology can play an important role in the clean energy transition,” Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, told summit attendees. But she added that “the reality today, in most markets, is a reality of a slow but steady decline in market share” for nuclear powerThe numbers underscore that downturn. Solar and wind power together began outperforming nuclear power globally in 2021, and that trend continues as nuclear staggers along. Solar alone added more than 400 gigawatts of capacity worldwide last year, two-thirds more than the previous year. That’s more than the roughly 375 gigawatts of combined capacity of the world’s 415 nuclear reactors, which remained relatively unchanged last year. Pledging to triple nuclear capacity by 2050 is a little like promising to win the lottery.For the United States, it would mean adding an additional 200 gigawatts of nuclear operating capacity (almost double what the country has ever built) to the 100 gigawatts or so that now exists, generated by more than 90 commercial reactors that have been running an average of 42 years. Globally it would mean tripling the existing capacity built over the past 70 years in less than half that time in addition to replacing reactors that will shut down before 2050.The Energy Department estimates the total cost of such an effort in the United States at roughly $700 billion. For much less money and in less time, the world can reduce greenhouse gas emissions through the use of renewables like solar, wind, hydropower and geothermal power.
Explore other topics that are important to Philippines voters.
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Diversity training is any program designed to facilitate positive intergroup interaction, reduce prejudice and discrimination, and generally teach individuals who are different from others how to work together effectively. On April 22, 2022, Florida Governor DeSantis signed into law the “Individual…
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in August 2022, which allocated millions to combating climate change and other energy provisions while additionally establishing a $7,500 tax credit for electric vehicles. To qualify for the subsidy 40% of the critical minerals used in electric-vehicle…