31% Yes |
69% No |
17% Yes |
65% No |
7% Yes, but only by court order |
4% No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
4% Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds |
|
2% Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism |
See how support for each position on “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 8.2k Philippines voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Government Surveillance” has changed over time for 8.2k Philippines voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Philippines users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@8LLVF5M3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if a crime was comitted and they need evidence.
@996XKCK1yr1Y
yes, to prevent terrorism, crimes, corruption, and scamming
@96882QV2yrs2Y
No. your personal data is treated almost literally in the same way as your own personal property
@967HBST2yrs2Y
The government shall only be allowed to monitor when an emergency call or contact is occuring
@95KTQ4C2yrs2Y
Yes if the said individual is under investigation or is convicted.
@93JDBB82yrs2Y
No, Because That is their Privacy and cannot be allowed to seen by anyone
Explore other topics that are important to Philippines voters.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)