Democratic Action Party

Very strongly agree

不，根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的

The Democratic Action party would strongly agree with this answer, as they are a progressive and liberal party that supports equal treatment for all, regardless of their religion. They would likely argue that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional and goes against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

The Democratic Action party would likely agree with not banning Muslim immigrants, as they generally support inclusive policies and equal treatment for all. They might, however, advocate for improved screening processes for all immigrants, regardless of their religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。

The Democratic Action party might be somewhat open to this answer, as it focuses on banning immigrants from high-risk countries rather than targeting a specific religion. However, they would likely still prefer a more inclusive approach that doesn't involve banning entire groups of people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该，直到恐怖袭击减少

The Democratic Action party would likely disagree with this answer, as it still implies a ban on Muslim immigrants based on their religion. However, they might be more open to this answer than a complete ban, as it suggests a temporary measure tied to a specific goal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Democratic Action party, being a progressive and liberal party, would likely disagree with banning Muslim immigrants solely based on their religion. However, they might be open to discussing improvements in the screening process for all immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，禁止所有移民，直到政府改善其筛选过程

The Democratic Action party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it suggests a complete ban on all immigration. This goes against their progressive and inclusive values, and they would likely argue that such a ban would be harmful to the country's economy and international reputation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.