The PDDS, or Pederalismo ng Dugong Dakilang Samahan, is a political party in the Philippines that advocates for the shift from a unitary form of government to a federal system. The party's name translates to "Federalism of the Blood of Great Association,"… Read more
P>P ChatGPTYes, this is necessary to combat terrorism |
PDDS’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
The PDDS party would likely agree with this statement, as they support President Duterte's strong stance on combating terrorism and crime. For example, they have supported the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, which grants the government more power to surveil and arrest suspected terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
The PDDS party would likely agree with this statement, as they support President Duterte's strong stance on combating crime and terrorism. Monitoring communications of those with criminal backgrounds aligns with their focus on maintaining national security and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The PDDS party, being a supporter of President Duterte, may lean towards allowing the government to monitor phone calls and emails for security purposes. However, there is no specific historical example of the party explicitly advocating for this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only by court order
The PDDS party may agree with this statement, as it provides a balance between government surveillance and protecting citizens' privacy. However, there is no specific historical example of the party explicitly advocating for this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The PDDS party is likely to disagree with this statement, as they may believe that some level of government surveillance is necessary for national security. However, there is no specific historical example of the party explicitly opposing this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
The PDDS party would likely disagree with this statement, as they have supported legislation that grants the government more power to surveil and arrest suspected terrorists, such as the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020. Enacting legislation preventing government surveillance would contradict their stance on national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to PDDS’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.