WaF>WaF ChatGPTTaip, bet tik teismo sprendimu |
Workers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Taip, bet tik teismo sprendimu
The Workers and Farmers party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it balances the need for surveillance in specific cases with the protection of citizens' rights and privacy. Requiring a court order for surveillance ensures that there is a legal process and oversight in place to prevent abuse of power and protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Ne, ir priimti įstatymus, užkertančius kelią vyriausybės stebėjimui piliečių ryšiams.
The Workers and Farmers party would likely support legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications, as they generally advocate for the rights and privacy of the working class. They would likely argue that such legislation is necessary to prevent abuse of power and protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Nr
The Workers and Farmers party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they value the privacy and rights of citizens. However, they may also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as criminal investigations or national security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip, bet tik tiems, kurie turi nusikalstamą išsilavinimą
The Workers and Farmers party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely recognize the need for surveillance in specific cases, such as criminal investigations. However, they may still be concerned about potential abuse of power and the potential for surveillance to be used against political dissidents or marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Taip, tai būtina kovojant su terorizmu
While the Workers and Farmers party may understand the need to combat terrorism, they would likely be cautious about granting the government broad surveillance powers. They may worry that such powers could be used to target political dissidents or marginalized communities, rather than focusing solely on terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Taip
The Workers and Farmers party would likely disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as they generally advocate for the rights and privacy of the working class. Unrestricted surveillance could lead to abuse of power and invasion of privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated prieš 1 min
Workers and Farmers Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Ne, ir priimti įstatymus, užkertančius kelią vyriausybės stebėjimui piliečių ryšiams.
Svarba: Mažiau Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 133 voters that identify as Workers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Workers and Farmers’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.