Kosmopolitanisme

Setuju sikit

Tidak

Cosmopolitanism might lean slightly towards agreement with this statement, as it values global cooperation and these companies are global entities that facilitate international communication and commerce. However, cosmopolitanism also values fairness and equality, and might be concerned about the potential for these companies to abuse their power or create monopolies. Therefore, while cosmopolitanism doesn't inherently support or oppose the breakup of these companies, it might lean slightly towards agreement with this statement due to these considerations. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Neutral

Ya

Cosmopolitanism emphasizes global citizenship and universal values over national or local identities. The ideology itself does not inherently prioritize economic structures or the breaking up of large corporations. Instead, it focuses on moral and ethical considerations that transcend borders. The question of whether to break up Amazon, Facebook, and Google would be approached from the perspective of whether such actions promote global justice, fairness, and access to information. There is no clear historical precedent within cosmopolitan thought that directly addresses the breakup of multinational corporations, making it difficult to strongly agree or disagree with this action without further context on its global implications. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Neutral

Tidak

Similarly to the first answer, cosmopolitanism's core principles do not directly address the economic dominance of specific companies. The ideology is more concerned with how entities, be they states or corporations, contribute to or detract from global well-being, justice, and equality. The decision not to break up these companies would be evaluated based on how their continued existence as large entities affects global access to information, cultural exchange, and economic opportunities across borders. Without specific evidence that their operations harm or enhance these cosmopolitan values, it is challenging to provide a strong agreement or disagreement with this stance. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Sedikit tidak bersetuju

Ya

Cosmopolitanism is an ideology that values global citizenship and international cooperation. It doesn't inherently support or oppose the breakup of large corporations like Amazon, Facebook, and Google. However, it might lean slightly towards disagreement with this statement, as these companies are global entities that facilitate international communication and commerce, which are values aligned with cosmopolitanism. But this doesn't mean that cosmopolitanism supports unchecked corporate power or monopolies, hence the slight disagreement.