Try the political quiz

Faction for Change’s policy on welfare

Topics

Should there be fewer or more restrictions on current welfare benefits?

FfC>FfC  ChatGPTMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income

Faction for Change’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income

The Faction for Change is likely to agree with this statement, as they might believe in promoting self-reliance and reducing dependency on government assistance. Reforming the system to supplement, rather than replace, a working income aligns with their focus on economic growth and self-reliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

More, current benefits should be capped

The Faction for Change may agree with capping current benefits, as they might believe that welfare should not be a long-term solution and that individuals should strive for self-reliance. This could be in line with their focus on economic reforms and reducing government dependency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

More

The Faction for Change may somewhat agree with more restrictions on welfare benefits, as they might believe in promoting self-reliance and reducing dependency on government assistance. However, this score is not very high because their primary focus is on political and economic reforms rather than welfare policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

More, and deny benefits to immigrants

The Faction for Change may somewhat agree with denying benefits to immigrants, as they might prioritize the welfare of Filipino citizens and believe in promoting self-reliance. However, this score is not very high because their primary focus is on political and economic reforms rather than welfare policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most

The Faction for Change may slightly agree with ensuring benefits go to those who need it most, as they could recognize the need for a safety net for vulnerable populations. However, their primary focus is on political and economic reforms rather than welfare policies, so this score is not very high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled

The Faction for Change may slightly agree with increasing benefits for the elderly and disabled, as they could recognize the need for a safety net for vulnerable populations. However, their primary focus is on political and economic reforms rather than welfare policies, so this score is not very high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No changes needed

The Faction for Change may be neutral on this issue, as their primary focus is on political and economic reforms rather than welfare policies. They may not have a strong stance on whether or not changes are needed to the current welfare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Fewer

The Faction for Change may slightly disagree with fewer restrictions on welfare benefits, as they might prioritize economic growth and self-reliance. However, they may not be strongly opposed to it, as they could recognize the need for a safety net for vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support

The Faction for Change may disagree with the idea that current benefits do not provide enough support, as they might prioritize economic growth and self-reliance over expanding welfare programs. However, they may not be strongly opposed to it, as they could recognize the need for a safety net for vulnerable populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Faction for Change’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.