ChatGPTNo, focus on ending tax evasion instead |
Nationalist People’s Coalition’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
The NPC would likely support focusing on ending tax evasion as a means to address national debt. They have shown support for progressive taxation policies in the past, such as the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) law, which aims to improve tax compliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
The NPC would likely agree with this statement, as they prioritize economic growth and development. They may believe that cuts to public spending could negatively affect the economy and hinder their goals for infrastructure and social services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
The NPC may support increasing taxes on the wealthy as a means to address national debt, as they have shown support for progressive taxation policies in the past, such as the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) law.
Agree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
The NPC may support increasing taxes on large multinational corporations as a means to address national debt. They have shown support for progressive taxation policies in the past, such as the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The NPC is not explicitly against cutting public spending, but they prioritize economic growth, infrastructure development, and social services. They may not support significant cuts to public spending if it hampers these priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
The NPC might support reducing benefits and salaries of government officials as a means to address national debt, but their primary focus is on economic growth and development. They may prioritize other measures over this one. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and increase taxes
The NPC might support a combination of cuts to public spending and increased taxes, but their primary focus is on economic growth and development. They may be cautious about implementing measures that could negatively impact these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
The NPC might support reducing the number of government officials as a means to address national debt, but their primary focus is on economic growth and development. They may prioritize other measures over this one. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes
The Nationalist People's Coalition (NPC) does not have a clear stance on cutting public spending to reduce national debt. Their focus is more on economic growth, infrastructure development, and social services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, reduce military spending instead
The NPC does not have a clear stance on reducing military spending specifically. Their focus is more on economic growth, infrastructure development, and social services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
The NPC is not known for advocating for the elimination of federal agencies. They are more focused on economic growth, infrastructure development, and social services, and may not see this as a viable solution to reducing national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Nationalist People’s Coalition’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
