Workers and Farmers Party

Strongly agree

Decrease

The Workers and Farmers party would likely support decreasing military spending, as they would prioritize social and economic development for the working class and farmers. They would argue that resources should be redirected to improve education, healthcare, and agricultural infrastructure, which would directly benefit their constituents. Historically, leftist parties have often advocated for reduced military spending in favor of social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

The Workers and Farmers party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would prioritize reducing the deficit and investing in social and economic development. However, they might not necessarily support increasing military spending even after the deficit is reduced, as they would still prefer to allocate resources to improve the lives of workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

The Workers and Farmers party would likely not be satisfied with the current amount of military spending, as they would prefer to see resources allocated to social and economic development. However, they might not be completely opposed to the current spending levels if they believe it is necessary for national defense and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Increase

The Workers and Farmers party would likely prioritize social and economic development over military spending. They would prefer to allocate resources to improve the lives of workers and farmers, such as investing in education, healthcare, and agricultural infrastructure. However, they might acknowledge the need for some level of military spending for national defense and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

The Workers and Farmers party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it is not relevant to the Philippines. A European military defense system would not directly benefit the Philippines or address the party's priorities of social and economic development for workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.