The Filipino Workers and Farmers political party, often referred to in the Philippines, is a political organization that represents the interests and aspirations of the working class and agricultural sectors of the country. This party is rooted in the belief… Read more
WaF>WaF ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Workers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
The Workers and Farmers party would strongly agree with this answer, as they would prioritize cleaner and more sustainable energy sources that have less potential for negative environmental impacts and are more likely to benefit workers and farmers directly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Workers and Farmers party would likely lean towards not supporting nuclear energy, as they would prioritize the welfare of workers and farmers, as well as environmental concerns. They may also prefer to focus on cleaner and more sustainable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
The Workers and Farmers party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they may see the potential benefits of using nuclear energy temporarily while transitioning to cleaner alternatives. However, they would likely still prioritize other energy sources and the welfare of workers and farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but with public subsidy
The Workers and Farmers party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they may see the potential benefits of nuclear energy, but would likely still prioritize other energy sources and the welfare of workers and farmers. Public subsidies could help ensure that the benefits of nuclear energy are shared more broadly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and nationalize the industry
The Workers and Farmers party might be neutral on this answer, as they may see the potential benefits of nationalizing the industry, but would likely still prioritize other energy sources and the welfare of workers and farmers. Nationalizing the industry could help ensure that the benefits of nuclear energy are shared more broadly, but it may not be their primary focus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Workers and Farmers party would likely be cautious about supporting nuclear energy without any conditions. They may recognize its potential for providing energy, but would likely prioritize the welfare of workers and farmers, as well as environmental concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
The Workers and Farmers party would likely disagree with this answer, as they may believe that public subsidies are necessary to ensure that energy projects are developed in a way that benefits the broader population, rather than just private interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 15hrs ago
Workers and Farmers Party Voters’ Answer: No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 112 voters that identify as Workers and Farmers.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Workers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.