@ISIDEWITHQuestionseconomy11yrs ago

Should there be fewer or more restrictions on current welfare benefits?

In 2011 the level of public spending on the welfare state by the British Government accounted for £113.1 billion, or 16% of government. By 2020 welfare spending will rise to 1/3rd of all spending making it the largest expense followed by housing benefit, council tax benefit, benefits to the unemployed, and benefits to people with low incomes.

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.3k Filipino [people] voters.

48%
Fewer
49%
More
42%
Fewer
37%
More
4%
Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most
6%
More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income
2%
Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support
4%
More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled
1%
More, and deny benefits to immigrants
1%
More, current benefits should be capped

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.3k Filipino [people] voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.3k Filipino [people] voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Filipino [people] voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8RRGF8Bfrom Mindoro Occidental  answered…4yrs4Y

Make welfare available only to legal citizens.

 @8LLDWG7from Mindoro Occidental  answered…5yrs5Y

No changes needed and deny benefits to non-citizens

 @8RRGJVDfrom Mindoro Occidental  answered…4yrs4Y

Make benefits available to only legal citizens.

 @8HGQJHFfrom Mindoro Occidental  answered…5yrs5Y

there should be fewer restrictions of welfare benefits for the poor, disabled, most unfortunate people, etc.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Welfare” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…7mos7MO

German Economy Nears Collapse As Election Nears

Presenting the CDU/CSU’s manifesto on Tuesday. Merz said he would make savings of €100bn by reducing spending on migration and welfare. He also promised tax cuts and lower electricity prices to kick-start the economy, stuck in its first two-year contraction since the early 2000s. Meanwhile, the SPD and Greens pledged to reform Germany’s “debt brake”, its constitutional cap on new borrowing, saying the country needed to invest billions of euros in its ramshackle infrastructure and the green transition.Meanwhile, the SPD and Greens pledged to reform Germany’s “debt brake”, its constitutional cap on new borrowing, saying the country needed to invest billions of euros in its ramshackle infrastructure and the green transition. Some observers worry Scholz’s televised intervention could end up setting the tone for the rest of the contest. Even the Greens, his allies in government, expressed disapproval. “One is sometimes surprised by his choice of words,” said Franziska Brantner, the Greens co-leader. Germany is not used to rambunctious, no-holds-barred elections. Under Scholz’s predecessor Angela Merkel, who governed Germany from 2005-2021, campaigns were soporific affairs, lacking the cut and thrust and spectacle often seen in US contests. But Merz is an altogether different politician. Critics routinely describe him as irascible and touchy, given to intemperate outbursts that delight his fans but can put off more moderate voters. But even his detractors admit his powerful oratory can get under Scholz’s skin. Scholz, too, has changed his tone. As chancellor of a fragile, three-party coalition made up of SPD, Greens and the liberal Free Democrats, he cultivated a decidedly restrained, taciturn style. But that changed in November when he sacked his liberal finance minister, Christian Lindner, triggering the break-up of the coalition after just three years. He has since become a lot more combative. In the vote of confidence debate he accused the liberals of “sabotaging the work of the government” and Lindner of lacking the “necessary moral maturity” required to govern.