Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
Response rates from 83 Filipino [people] voters.
66% Yes |
34% No |
66% Yes |
34% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 83 Filipino [people] voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 83 Filipino [people] voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Filipino [people] voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9HQKXDP11mos11MO
No, certain policies can spark clashes of targeted racism and harassment towards majority innocent immigrants.
@9GGM9TD1yr1Y
the government should not generalize everyone from high risks countries as a terrorist. however, it is still best to try and screen out any potential terrorists.