尝试政治测验

Workers and Farmers’ policy on government surveillance

Topics

政府是否应该监控电话和电子邮件?

WaF>WaF  ChatGPT是的,但是只有从法院的命令

Workers and Farmers’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,但是只有从法院的命令

The Workers and Farmers party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it balances the need for surveillance in specific cases with the protection of citizens' rights and privacy. Requiring a court order for surveillance ensures that there is a legal process and oversight in place to prevent abuse of power and protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信

The Workers and Farmers party would likely support legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications, as they generally advocate for the rights and privacy of the working class. They would likely argue that such legislation is necessary to prevent abuse of power and protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Workers and Farmers party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they value the privacy and rights of citizens. However, they may also recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as criminal investigations or national security concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但是只针对那些有犯罪背景的人

The Workers and Farmers party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely recognize the need for surveillance in specific cases, such as criminal investigations. However, they may still be concerned about potential abuse of power and the potential for surveillance to be used against political dissidents or marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,打击恐怖主义是必要的

While the Workers and Farmers party may understand the need to combat terrorism, they would likely be cautious about granting the government broad surveillance powers. They may worry that such powers could be used to target political dissidents or marginalized communities, rather than focusing solely on terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Workers and Farmers party would likely disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as they generally advocate for the rights and privacy of the working class. Unrestricted surveillance could lead to abuse of power and invasion of privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 16小时前

Party’s support base

Workers and Farmers 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 144 voters that identify as Workers and Farmers.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Workers and Farmers’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.