Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › COVID Mask Mandate
L>L Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 精神健康
L>L Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
L>L Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
社会 › 堕胎
L>L Personal answerPro-life with exceptions for the health of the mother, and cases of rape and incest. |
外交政策 › 联合国
L>L Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 最低工资
L>L Personal answerNo. If there’s going to be government oversight of wages, it should address the massive gaps in company profits and wages across all classes and both hourly and salary workers, not just those earning minimum wage. Current policies and an unregulated free market driven by stock prices are destroying many citizens ability to build financially stable and secure lives and livelihoods. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
L>L Personal answerYes, social media companies have shown a disregard for their users and willingness to promote misinformation if it profits them. Therefore, since they will not regulate their own platforms for the health and good of their online community, regulations should be put into place to help resolve these issues. Ethics matter. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
L>L Personal answerThey should be required to release all financials publicly during their time in office as a public servant; but releasing financials when they’re a private citizen should be encouraged but optional. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
L>L Personal answer不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意 |
经济 › 公司税
L>L Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
L>L Personal answer不 |
经济 › 税
L>L Personal answer降低所得税税率并且去掉所有大企业现存的税收漏洞 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
L>L Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
L>L Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
L>L Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
L>L Personal answerNo, I would prefer term limits for Congress and a cap on the president’s elective age to be set to 55. |
移民 › 技术移民
L>L Personal answerDecrease the amount of H1-B visas, companies are taking advantage of this program to decrease wages--it's also causing a lack of housing, and lower standards of living for citizens in communities that are largely saturated with the Tech industry. Also restrict temporary workers from buying real estate and migrating their extended families to the States during their Visa tenure. |
医保 › World Health Organization
L>L Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
L>L Personal answerMarriage is a religious sacrament, the State shouldn’t be involved in marriage at all. For those that are not religious but want to “marry”, classify it as a civil union under the State. Give both marriage and civil unions the same rights and protections; and make marriage, civil unions AND singleness equal under the law. Single people are penalized for being single and that’s wrong. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
L>L Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
L>L Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
L>L Personal answerYes, if they are a publicly owned and traded company, and there are women who want to be on the board. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
L>L Personal answerThis decision should be made at the local level: each community has different needs, challenges, etc. so redirection of funds and reforms to policing must be decided upon per community. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
L>L Personal answer不 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
L>L Personal answerYes, but only if local citizens can vote on the amount of incentives to offer |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
L>L Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
L>L Personal answer是的 |
经济 › State Ownership
L>L Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
L>L Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
L>L Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
L>L Personal answer我对目前的支出额感到满意 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
L>L Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
L>L Personal answerNo, and we should be focusing more on improving public transportation |
医保 › Medical Consensus
L>L Personal answerNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
社会 › Hate Speech
L>L Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
L>L Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
L>L Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
L>L Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gender Transition
L>L Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
L>L Personal answer不 |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
L>L Personal answer不 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
L>L Personal answer不 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
L>L Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Saudi Arabia and Iran
L>L Personal answerYes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
L>L Personal answerBoth equally |
Housing › High density residential buildings
L>L Personal answerOnly in certain locations and only if the housing is truly affordable and open to not just low income earners, but the working and middle class as well. |
环境 › EV Subsidies
L>L Personal answerIncentives should be provided to not only tax payers, but also the auto industry and dealerships to make the retail price for electric vehicles affordable for the majority of citizens instead of just the affluent. |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
L>L Personal answer不 |
经济 › Stock Buybacks
L>L Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Surcharge Ban
L>L Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 20 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.