Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
EJF>EJF Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
EJF>EJF Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › 联合国
EJF>EJF Personal answer应该,但请相应缩减我们目前的参与的事情 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
EJF>EJF Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
EJF>EJF Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
EJF>EJF Personal answer是的,而且他们在任的每一年要求一个公开审计 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
EJF>EJF Personal answer增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
EJF>EJF Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
经济 › 公司税
EJF>EJF Personal answer减少,但是消除扣除额和漏洞 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
EJF>EJF Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
经济 › 税
EJF>EJF Personal answer降低所得税税率并且去掉所有大企业现存的税收漏洞 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
EJF>EJF Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
环境 › Animal Testing
EJF>EJF Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
EJF>EJF Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
医保 › World Health Organization
EJF>EJF Personal answerNo, fund national and local programs instead |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
EJF>EJF Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
经济 › 自由贸易
EJF>EJF Personal answer是的,但是只有有力的保护我们的国家资源和制定的每个贸易协议工人 |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
EJF>EJF Personal answerNon, permettons les unions civiles mais ne parlons pas de mariage |
移民 › 公民考试
EJF>EJF Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
EJF>EJF Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
EJF>EJF Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
EJF>EJF Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
EJF>EJF Personal answerYes, as long as the local environment is not compromised |
经济 › State Ownership
EJF>EJF Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
EJF>EJF Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
EJF>EJF Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
EJF>EJF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
EJF>EJF Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
EJF>EJF Personal answer我对目前的支出额感到满意 |
社会 › Hate Speech
EJF>EJF Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.