Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
j>j Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › 联合国
j>j Personal answer不,而且应该移除联合国在美国的总部 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
j>j Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
j>j Personal answerDecrease and bring all of our soldiers home from ALL bases and close them. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
j>j Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
经济 › 公司税
j>j Personal answer保持当前税率,但是要消除扣除额和漏洞 |
医保 › 安全港
j>j Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
j>j Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
经济 › 税
j>j Personal answerReform to a flat tax and abolish all loopholes for all, including corporations |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
j>j Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
环境 › Animal Testing
j>j Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
经济 › 经济刺激
j>j Personal answerNo, and the government should drastically reduce spending. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
j>j Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
医保 › World Health Organization
j>j Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective |
移民 › 技术移民
j>j Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
j>j Personal answer不 |
移民 › 公民考试
j>j Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
j>j Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
j>j Personal answerNo, the police should be de-militarized and better trained in non-violent confrontations and use of deadly force. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
j>j Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
j>j Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
j>j Personal answer不 |
经济 › State Ownership
j>j Personal answerNO, and the government should not bail out private businesses |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
j>j Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
j>j Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
j>j Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
外交政策 › 外国援助
j>j Personal answer减少,我们不应该给任何国家对外援助 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
j>j Personal answerRegardless, the government should not tell private businesses how many days to work in a week. We have sufficient laws in place for this. |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
j>j Personal answerNATO is obsolete and we should withdraw. |
社会 › Hate Speech
j>j Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
j>j Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
j>j Personal answerNo, we should not get involved in this conflict |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
j>j Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gender Transition
j>j Personal answerYes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
j>j Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
j>j Personal answerYes, but only for cryptocurrencies that hold stable value without price fluctuation |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.