Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
J>J Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
J>J Personal answerIt Depends. If they have finished serving their sentence (for a minor crime (e.g., protesting)), then-Yes. However, if A. the crime was committed while in office & B. it was a felony, violent, financial, sexual, etc., crime, then-No. Still, we should disallow politicians that are OR get put under investigation for a crime, whether before OR while running for office. |
交通运输 › 公共交通
J>J Personal answerYes, and provide more free public transportation, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
J>J Personal answerNo, this is a violation of free speech, but even though I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so. Plus, it Personally believe that it has now become just a piece of cloth that doesn’t represent what it should anymore, because America is an Oligarchy and NOT a Democracy |
社会 › 死刑
J>J Personal answerYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence, because too many people are innocently convicted. Plus, I think that spending life in prison is a harsher sentence because the dead don't suffer unless their soul was sent to hell that is. |
外交政策 › 联合国
J>J Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 携带武器的教师
J>J Personal answerNo because this would increase the risk of accidental shootings, therefore schools should hire trained professional security guards. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
J>J Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
J>J Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
J>J Personal answer减少 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
J>J Personal answerNo. However the sentence should depend on why the person was trafficking drugs in the first place. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
J>J Personal answerYes, even though officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption |
经济 › 公司税
J>J Personal answerRaise for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses while eliminating deductions and loop holes. |
医保 › 安全港
J>J Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
经济 › 政府支出
J>J Personal answerNo, instead we should A. reduce military spending, B. focus on ending tax evasion, and C. increase taxes on the wealthy |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
J>J Personal answerYes, for most but not all drugs, and we should also retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time |
经济 › 税
J>J Personal answerYes, and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations, and lower taxes for the poor. |
医保 › 大麻
J>J Personal answerYes, but only for medical use, and A. immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses, & B. legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
J>J Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
J>J Personal answerYes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone and private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare. This should be in form of tax and should not be that expensive. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
J>J Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
J>J Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
J>J Personal answerYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes,but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
J>J Personal answerYes, but only after living in the country for between 5 - 10 years, and even then, they will only be allowed to vote only in local elections, until they become full-fledged citizens of the United States |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
J>J Personal answerYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test |
医保 › World Health Organization
J>J Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
J>J Personal answerNo, because these types of donations just turn into bribes from corporations, but allow donations from unions and non-profits, since (I think) they don't have a record of bribing political parties |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
J>J Personal answerYes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis while under house arrest using an electronic bracelet. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
J>J Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
移民 › 公民考试
J>J Personal answerYes. However, it should only cover very basic and simple topics, but if they want to, then they can be allowed to take a test that tests more than just a basic level of understanding |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
J>J Personal answerNo, but they should be given the option to remove the ad if the information in it is all false [and/or] misleading |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
J>J Personal answerYes, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote |
外交政策 › 外国选举
J>J Personal answerNo, after all, we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy because it’s not only ended in disaster in the long run, but it would be considered a Crime against Democracy, aka Democracide. However, personally, we should, but only to A. address security threats, not monetary interests, B. protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, and C. influence public opinion, & not tamper with a fair voting process, just as long as our actions are not considered a Democracide aka Crimes against Democracy, then I’m for it. |
经济 › 政府养老金
J>J Personal answerYes, and adjust them yearly so that retired government workers can receive an income to cover the basic necessities including food and housing |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
J>J Personal answerYes, but the funding for local police departments and social & community-based programs should be split equally. However, for police departments in higher crime rate communities, then the funding and training should increase. |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
J>J Personal answerYes, we should respect all cultural traditions, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member, just in case. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
J>J Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
社会 › 安乐死
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, and after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
J>J Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
J>J Personal answer是的 |
经济 › State Ownership
J>J Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
移民 › 双重国籍
J>J Personal answerYes, unless they have committed a very serious crime OR an act of terrorism |
罪行 › Private Prisons
J>J Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
J>J Personal answerNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations because of the abuse of loopholes in order to evade taxes. |
外交政策 › 外国援助
J>J Personal answerIncrease, but only for countries with no human rights violations/countries that are legitimately trying to improve and modernize. |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
J>J Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if they use renewable energy sources |
社会 › Hate Speech
J>J Personal answerAt this point, I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, but it should all depend on the circumstances. Yes, a person’s hate speech can be protected by the first amendment, just as long as it does not encourage people to commit acts of violence against others. Still, I (personally) believe that the freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
J>J Personal answerNo, higher agencies should handle extreme situations with specialized training and equipment. However, if police departments are given strict training on how and when to use the equipment, and will only use military-grade equipment in response to extreme situations like the higher agencies with specialized training and equipment, then Yes. |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
J>J Personal answer不 |
社会 › Gender Transition
J>J Personal answerYes, just as long as the person under the age of 18 years old fully understands the choice of this irreversible life decision |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
J>J Personal answerNo, because that could Risk starting World War III, which could then evolve into a Nuclear War, which will end in Nuclear Armageddon aka a Nuclear Holocaust, resulting in the end of the world |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
J>J Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
J>J Personal answerNo, because the level of unpredictability makes cryptocurrency simply untenable = flawed |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
J>J Personal answerNo, but they should be kept somewhere safe like a migrant-specific shelter with all basic necessities provided until they’re thoroughly screened and cleared |
国内政策 › TikTok Ban
J>J Personal answerYes & No, because Banning TikTok is a violation of free speech, but at the same time, we should do more to stop China from collecting data on our citizens. |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
J>J Personal answerBoth Equally, to a degree, but if I had to choose only one, then I would say that I sympathize with Palestine more because of how Innocent People of Gaza are Victims of Israeli War Crimes? |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.