Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer应该,而且焚烧任何国家的国旗都应该是非法的 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as they are capable of raising a child and providing a good future for them. |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
9>9 Personal answerNo, death penalty should only be done to persons who have done heinous crimes. Drug traffickers should be put under strict rehabilitation centers and make sure that they receive a reasonable livelihood job for them to start they life over. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answerDecrease, considering the amount of money spent on military purposes than in medical facilities, needs, and health workers. |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
9>9 Personal answerYes, but it shouldn't only be limited to prioritizing military combat skills, but also in the field of giving aid (medic), and enhancing skills needed to survive if an unwanted war came through. They also should consider the abilities of each person considering that every person is different in terms of health and capabilities. |
经济 › 政府支出
9>9 Personal answerNo, reduce military spending, provide a transparency spending report, and ban asking for confidential funds that makes the Philippines in great debts |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only for those who completed their sentences and is given reasonable parole, and except for those who committed heinous crimes. |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
国内政策 › 举报人保护
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only id the information is legally and ethically obtained and doesn't threaten our national security. Yet, don't reduce their sentences. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answerYes, but they should be put in rehabilitation centers instead to avoid them committing the same crime over again. Thus, this implies that they should invest more in rehabilitation centers. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
9>9 Personal answerNo, pursuing a more sustainable alternative is the best choice and also conducting more research to its effects is needed before deciding such things. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNo, make it a forceful act of giving them shelter and still provide adequate rights that wouldn't make them feel suffocated or restricted. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answerNo, and we should be focusing more on improving public transportation |
医保 › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answerYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
9>9 Personal answerYes, this would reduce wealth inequality by providing more transparent, affordable, and inclusive access to financial services |
外交政策 › Saudi Arabia and Iran
9>9 Personal answerNo, only if it is an immediate threat to our safety |
国内政策 › TikTok Ban
9>9 Personal answerNo, but there should be more age restrictions on social media apps |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.