Makimaza Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only by court order

The Makimaza party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it provides a clear legal framework for government surveillance while still protecting individual rights and privacy. Requiring a court order for monitoring phone calls and emails ensures that surveillance is only used in specific, justified cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

The Makimaza party would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it balances their concerns for individual rights and privacy with the need for surveillance in specific cases. Monitoring communications of those with criminal backgrounds could be seen as a reasonable compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

The Makimaza party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally advocate for the protection of individual rights and privacy. Enacting legislation to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications aligns with their values, but they may still recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases.

Agree

No

The Makimaza party would likely lean towards agreeing with this answer, as they value individual rights and privacy. However, they may also acknowledge the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases, such as for national security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

The Makimaza party might slightly agree with this answer, as they could recognize the need for surveillance in combating terrorism. However, their focus on individual rights and privacy would likely make them cautious about endorsing broad surveillance measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Makimaza party would likely disagree with unrestricted government monitoring of phone calls and emails, as they generally advocate for the protection of individual rights and privacy. However, they may recognize the need for some level of surveillance in specific cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.